John Calvin |
Before I
begin, no I don’t consider myself a good apologist like… well you can insert
your favorite name wherever. However when I have a hundred things on my
mind (ie: I am going crazy) I do my most sane thinking [ha, take that
Chestertonians!].
So the apologetic
is focused on disproving the Calvinist notion that we have no free will.
I don’t know if this is a new apologetic but I’m just putting it out there
without a copy right because… well… im dumb.
When
Christ was in Gesemene, sweating blood over what was about to happen he asked
His Father to take the chalice from him, but that it be the Fathers will and
not his own that would be done.
So too St.
Paul tells us in his letter to the Hebrews that Christ was like us in all ways,
except in sinning.
If Christ was
tempted and choose against sin, and he was like us in all ways except that he
would not sin, then that necessitates a free will in man to choose right and
wrong.
Some might
object that Christ could not choose to sin because He is the “all good, being
God”. If we were concerned here with the first or third Persons of the
Blessed trinity this would be true for their only nature is divine, just as
their personhood is divine. Jesus, being the second person of the blessed
Trinity indeed was solely a divine person; however, we profess that Christ had
two natures, both a human and a divine. This is often referred to as the
hypostatic union and is affirmed even by the Calvinist.
So since
Christ had a human nature he was free to choose that which is good and reject
that which is evil (sin). Since this is true and he is like us in all
ways except sin, we as people having a single nature, being human, have a free
will to choose right and wrong. Like our Lord in Gesemene we can say
“take this chalice from me”, but we can also state “thy will be done,” because
we are not perfected creatures yet.
+JMJ+
No comments:
Post a Comment