It's been a while since I uploaded new Fr. Hardon videos on specific topics, so I give you some new ones:
Fr. John Hardon S.J. on whether equal devotion should be given to the Bible and the Eucharist
Fr. John Hardon S.J. on the evil accusations made by Luther about Jesus Christ
Fr. John Hardon S.J. on what is an Odor of Sanctity?
Fr. John Hardon S.J. on John Rockefeller and how Calvinism influenced his predestination ideas
Showing posts with label bible. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bible. Show all posts
Friday, February 27, 2015
Friday, September 20, 2013
Bringing the Sword
I was just on the road doing the typical runabout for my job
and during this time the part in the gospel where Christ leaves the last supper
with the three came to me. Specifically
speaking, when Christ tells them to being with them a sword. Peter shows them his, and Jesus tells him
that will be enough.
I must admit I am rather confused on this part of
scripture. Christ knew he was going to
die, yet he tells them to be armed. Now
I’m no theologian and I have zero experience in any classroom with regards to
the faith, but I’m just going to wing it because I like to think things through
out loud, usually just among friends but hey don’t take me too seriously with
what I write and correct me if you think I’m way off. I accept criticism with gratitude!
So anyways Christ tells some of his followers to bring
swords with them as he heads off to Gethsemane, to which Peter revels his
sword, Christ approves and they leave.
My initial take on this action in revealing the sword that
is called for by God we see a foreshadowing of the Church Militant, called to
battle by God. Christ’s order to bring
the weapon contrasts with his “Learn from me, for I am meek and humble of heart”. Many people would say that this is a contradiction,
how can one at the same time be meek and yet willingly violent? Do you remember when Christ told his
followers to turn the cheek when someone slaps them and let them slap the
other. Yet how many of us realize that
when Christ stands before the Sanhedrin and is slapped his meekness remains as
does his humility, but he questions the man who slapped him, questioning the
motive and calling the person out for their action. Here we see violence, perhaps not physically,
but a verbal and mental violence where the person is confronted and attacked in
his environment. In his humility Christ
demands the person to cease, forcing him out of the comfort of mockery into a
moment of clarity where a path must be choosen, a dividing point like the edge
of the blade. In the garden when Peter
reveals the sword it seems to me that a new division is underway. That the Apostles don’t hesitate to bring
forth a blade is also telling. We are
called the Church Militant for a reason, and its not so people can pose for
pictures with the Knights of Columbus playing dress up when seeking
fraternal. Our weapons may not be
physical but they are indeed real. The
Rosary is the greatest weapon our Lord has granted to us, and he tells us
through is Blessed Mother to make this a daily devotion. I cant tell you how important this is, JUST
DO IT!
The sword is then revealed again when Christ is confronted
by the Sanhedrin guard. Here we see
Peter in a moment of confusion pull the dagger and strike the servant of the
high priest. Jesus then repremends him
telling him to put the sword back in the scabbard, that those who live by the
sword with surely die by it.
Now if you are anything like me you are scratching your head….”But
Jesus didn’t you have him bring the sword for a reason? I don’t get it. Is it but only a decoration? Something to look fierce with?”
It seems to me that in this moment of savagery Our Lord is
reminding Peter that different times call for different reactions. For Christ knew that he was going to his
death but he encouraged his followers to bring a sword. In other words violence has its time and
reason, and God is not against such action for the right reason. Hence he involves the weapon in the
matter. So too in his providence he knew
Peter would strike at the servant and would have to be reprimanded. But think about that for a second. Later Peter will deny our Lord, but here
perhaps in a moment of confusion and self defense thinking of his own well
being he moves to action. Is his
thinking about Christ here? Im not
sure. It seems like his own desires are
first and foremost in his mind when striking.
Just as when he was rebuked after Proclaiming Christ and being named the
Rock. In other words his mind is not on
Christ, but on selfish desires.
We are then struck with how God can take a moment of
confusion and trial and turn it into something good. He heals the servant of the High Priest who
was against him more than likely. So it
was ordained from time immemorial that God would bring good out of such
confusion and violence. Think about the
crusades here, but I wont delve into that today, perhaps another time. Many of you know that this servant later left
this band of henchmen and his own priest and took up fellowship with the
Apostles. So in a moment of disaster
when chaos reigns Christ in his own action of calling for the sword to be
brought influenced how this servant would later be brought to faith.
Now I know some might object that one cannot bring good by
perpetrating evil, but that’s not what I am getting at. The slicing of the servants ear was a turning
point a literal severing of what was into what is to come, Christ entering into
his life.
Well that’s my thoughts, what do you think?
Monday, April 22, 2013
Mary, Statues, Veneration and Adoration
Hey, Sorry I was a little late on responding. I got tied up at work for a while longer than
I hoped
Your question of in practice we make both concepts appear
the same might just look so to an outsider but there is context. First Bowing and praying to the statue is a confused
saying. The statue in itself is just a
statue. Just like when Christ references
Moses in Numbers 21:8-9 in John 3:14
where Moses creates a serpentine figure and fixes it to a pole with the
intention that if the people looked upon the figure, which by itself is just
material not worth any veneration nor adoration of any sort, and are to be
healed by it. Now what are they healed
by? The figure or the thing which it represents which is the foreshadowing of
the son of man taking on the sins of the world and being lifted up on the
crossSecond we don’t pray to statues or icons of Mary the saints or even to a picture of the Blessed
Trinity. Pictures, statues and icons are
Holy images because of what they represent, what they call into mind. In themselves they are not holy any more than
Elijah’s material and dead bones in 2 Kings 13:14 or the objects that
touched Paul and were venerated in Acts 19:11-12. So too its not the cape of Jesus nor Peter who
healed the people that touched them but the thing that lies behind them, that
is Gods Grace. If someone kneels or prays before an image that doesn’t mean
that they adore the image. For instance when Jacob bows before Esau or Abraham
bows before his companions at Mamre in Gen 18:2, Lot in Genesis 19:1. Any bowing that is done is done in a manner
of reverence for the person (ie: honoring the person for who they are in
Christ), not that we adore them and especially we don’t adore the image for the
image helps us to call into mind the greater reality that lies behind itFor example have you ever
looked at a picture of someone you love and kissed the picture? You don’t love the plastic and paper nor the ink that
produced the image but the thing it represents.
Venerating a statue of Jesus or any Saint which includes the Blessed Virgin
calls into mind the person, who they were, what they did in Christ. And simply put why do we do this? Because in these things we give glory to
God. Just think about it. Why is Mary important, why in here magnificat does she declare that all generations shall call her blessed? Here blessedness is because of Christ, because from all time he thought of his mother and he practiced the 5th commandment to a greater degree than anyone else. So too we are called to imitate Christ in all things. Did he adore Mary? No shes a creature, he is the eternal word, the logos, of the father. In following Christ we recognize and come to love his Mother who he formed, who he choose among all to be his mother, the one who suffers along (not greater than or apart from) with Christ because of what God wanted of her as stated by Simeon in Luke 2:25-35. If we are part of his body as we are once we are brought in by baptism then she is in a mystical sense our own mother and this is what the Church recognized from the very beginning, her role being of amazing importance in salvation history. Her be it done to me according to your word, her ability to do so is only by His grace, but she having free will submitted it to him, undoing the sin of the first women, the reversing of the Garden story. So too Paul reminds us that being one Body we cant say to one part of the body I don’t need you, and death he also tells us doesn’t separate us in Christ. If the confusion rests in the times spent before a statue or a picture I can also help you with that. Mary, as I have said before is our Mother we love her and like a child they have a father and a Mother. We love to run to her that, she being righteous like James 5:16 says, she may seek his mercy for us, not because we cant go to him directly (because we do that constantly and especially when we receive him Body Blood soul and Divinity in the Blessed Sacrament which being him we do adore). But because the more help we can get the better off we are being sinners and all. Consider that we spend the majority of the sacred liturgy kneeling, bowing and so forth before a crucifix, now in all reality how much time is spent before an image of Mary is most likely less. But lets say for arguments sake that someone does spend a lot of time in front of a statue of Mary or a favorite saint. The reason why the saint or Mary specifically is important is because of Christ. For instance we can go to se the Grave of Leonardo DiVinci or we can go see his great works like the Mona Lisa. Generally, and I could be wrong, more people go to see his great paintings then himself. Does that mean that they think less of him then of his works of course not, it was he that made it in the first and in showing love for the work, as in showing love for the work of his creation Be it Mary, the saints or even a wonderful sunset to a lesser degree we glorify him and our actions whether amazement, kneeling or bowing before the beauty of the representation speaks to the one who is the cause in the first.
Finally all people who assist at the Holy Sacrifice adore
Christ in his Eucharistic form. The way
that we do so is generally through prayers of adoration be it mental or vocal. Sometimes we just behold him who is the way
the truth and the life as Mary does when she sits at his feet doing nothing and
Martha is frustrated by her inaction.
Every action has an intent just as veneration and adoration do. Both are different things and might well look
like the same thing to someone without the context or knowledge of the intent
which in itself is in the person’s heart.
If someone adores an image or a creature they are wrong and should be
called out on the carpet just as much as people that create their own personal understandings
of the Trinity or Christ violate the one true God and need to be called out as
Matthew 18:15-18 tells us. But it is the
Church that is the pillar and foundation of the truth that defines this, and
explicitly teaches the difference between veneration and adoration as Luke
10:16 teaches along with many other examples like why are there 27 books that
constitute the time after the Birth of Christ.
I do hope this helps, and feel free to ask more questions on
this topic or anything else at your wish.
The following link might also be helpful:
Have a great day
+JMJ+
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
