Most people
by now have either read or heard about the Holy Fathers latest Apostolic
Exhortation. To no ones surprise its long and encompasses a wide range of
topics, one of which is a few short notes on economics, including how
Capitalism that is unrestrained is very problematic. Thus began the fire storm. From Limbaugh to Novak to Judge Andrew
Napolitano people have been writing often times scathing critiques on what the
Holy Father said. Many claim him to be
outright or tettering on the edge of Marxism.
One of my
Favorite quotes comes from Judge Napolitano
who identifies as a libertarian and a “Pre-Vatican II Catholic” (not
SSPX, just as arrogant though):
“What shall we do about the pope and economics?”
Napolitano asked in conclusion. “We should pray for his faith and understanding
and for a return to orthodoxy. That means the Holy Mother Church under the
Vicar of Christ — saving souls, not pocketbooks.”
Now think for a second
what is wrong with this thinking. Never
mind that the conservative/libertarian mind is unable to see that there are
other options then Economic Marxism and Laize Faire Free Markets, but he does
the same foolish thing to the Holy Father that he would rail against had a
liberal said something similar. What
does he mean that we need to pray for the Popes return to Orthodoxy? This is a sidestep. There is nothing unorthodox about what
he said.
Others like Chesterton, Belloc, the new distributists and Leo XIII who
got the ball rolling said the same thing, yet to question Capitalism is unconscionable! It is to say that to say any thing critical
of Capitalism necessarily puts you against science and in front of a lay run inquisition. Pray tell the last time Napolitano or even
for that matter a Pope in the last 50 years has spoke about the evil of Usary
which is a common byproduct of capitalism regulated and unregulated?
The truth is that when
Peter talks about economics he is not over stepping his boundaries because they
indeed are tinted with moral issues that
are exploited for gain, then will later be justified by an ends, thereby doing
the same thing Saul Alinsky did and that the conservative/libertarians rail
against at all times of the day.
Its pure B.S! And for a so called “Pre-Vatican II Cathlic”
to be so incompetent with regards to the obvious moral issue inherent only
makes me question his real motives…perhaps love of the world?
…just sayin
No comments:
Post a Comment