So we're at it again with the modernists.
Tear down anything that even has a pinch of Catholicity
for the sake of connecting better with the culture and with the times.
The one thing that always pops up that is a discipline and
therefore can be changed is the commitment to priestly celibacy. In todays hyper sexualized world we are
constantly told that people cannot control their sexual desires and priests
should not be expected to do so either.
We are also told that the celibate lifestyle is the true cause of the
sex abuse trial. Furthermore it is
stated that if we just loosed the discipline we would not have the priestly
shortage that will plague the church now and going on into the future.
I cannot tell you how much the celibate life is so despised
by people in today’s world. It’s like today’s
world is still staring at Christ up on the cross and telling him to come
down. This attitude is not limited to celibacy
it also relates as to how Catholics view the sacred liturgy.
As a side note I want to quick hit the attitude toward the
liturgy by even orthodox Catholics.
During the pontificate of Benedict XVI, the Holy Father attempted to
restore some of the traditions of liturgy which developed organically over the
last 2000 of sacred history. He was
often maligned by the “progressives” and even at points he was condemned by the
orthodox faithful for being pompous in bringing back the beautiful aspects
often referred to as the trapping of his office. Things like the fanon, the walking cross,
historical vestments and miters were shunned by many as monarchial and not
focused on the people enough, that they can’t connect with that life style. Now enter Pope Francis who is a simple
Jesuit. Referred to as humble for not
wanting all the supposed “trappings” of the office like the mozetta, the papal
apartments, the golden pectoral cross and the liturgical laws of the
church. Immediately Francis can do no
wrong in his thoughts and actions and whatever he does it must be defended as De
Fide. Many of us who are often referred
to as rad-trads or even accept and use the term were also out and critical of
certain aspects of Benedict’s papacy, including Assisi III and his less than
enthusiastic use of the Tridentine Mass. So now that we challenge this supposed notion
of humility that people have tagged as relating to his simplicity. Yet many of us so called trads don’t accept
this connection on its face like the happy clappy orthodox crowd do. His choice in celebrating the Sacred Liturgy
towards the people to begin his pontificate was somewhat concerning because
Benedict had made it a point to offer the sacrifice Ad Orientem in the Sistine
Chapel. Now my view on this is that he
is more comfortable doing it one way and since that first couple days his probably
a confusing and often threatening time a little comfort for his Holiness should
be afforded. There is an old Jesuit joke
that as long as no one is hurt during a Jesuit liturgy things went well! It is a funny joke but quite frankly just a
modern thing to pass up the lack of reverence and commitment to proper offering
of the liturgy which was no problem for Jesuits prior to the 1800’s at the very
least. Simplicity doesn’t mean that we
are able to identify with a person any better than if an action was complex.
Living in a Vatican suite is no more humble than living in the papal
apartments, sure it might be less square feet but the apartments don’t drop
into Earth they are still there and still will need to be maintained. I personally don’t care where he lives or
whether he wears a silver pectoral cross but too many people are back handing Benedict
by pretending that his love for the sacred aspects of the office can’t be
reconciled with the poor of the church.
Its like during the whole Benedictine papacy all he did was mock the
poor, treating them as dirt. But anyone
with half a brain knows this to be utter bafoonery. Even some prelates which don’t deserve their
names
mentioned here have proclaimed the Francisican Papacy as a glorious
return to low churching. I don’t know
about anyone else but if there is anything I hate it’s the idea that being lite
Catholic is a good thing. We should not
shun our history, we should not shun the things that developed in the church
organically. We should applaud such
things and treat them with the due reverence and help people that don’t understand
them to have such. So too when something
isn’t organic but pieced together in a hodge podge way like the New Mass was we
don’t condemn it as invalid, since its validity is a matter of discipline for
form, but we need to ask whether the idea that many point to as sacred
simplicity has been taken to a point which it should never have become. So to finish up this note humility and
simplicity are different aspects. It is
humble for one to accept the office and all the things that go with it, and in
doing so not use it and laud it over others, yet to stand by its importance and
the so called trappings don’t make it somehow less respectable for such things
are timeless and often times stand against a culture that is that is against us
in the first place, not to mention against Peters authority.
Now back to celibacy.
First the argument that celibacy leads to pedophile predators is on its
face false in the nicest matter and straight libel and calumny in its sternest
understanding. Not partaking in the marital
embrace is no reason to then go out and rape a child. You cant even say that they are exploding on
the inside and therefore are only acting out because they are suppressed because
there are many faithful Catholics (a majority by far) who are single and
chaste, and don’t molest children. The
John Jay report which was done to find the causes of the sex abuse crisis
showed to those without an agenda that the crisis is a result of homosexuals
who found their way into the clerical state and used their position of
authority to perpetrate their hideous deeds.
This homosexual culture that has
penetrated the Church has been documented by many sources including the book “Good
Bye, Good Men” which I highly recommend, and even the recent report by a Polish
Priest who did a study on behalf of concerned prelates. It must be pointed out that this is the
primary cause of the abuse crisis and not whether someone is celibate.
Second no one forces anyone to become a priest and therefore
accept the discipline, so to say that they are forced into this unnatural
situation is a sham on its face. No one
is guaranteed the priesthood, and when a person chooses to enter into the state
they do so knowing the rules of the life.
So to make the point that they are trapped in this unnatural state
leading to them acting out on their sexuality is a faulty notion. Can you imagine trying to justify a married
man whose wife is abstaining from the marital embrace, goes out and commits adultery
then they come back and say well its her fault I couldn't help myself. There is a certain thing called self-control
that should be expected of all people.
I, being chaste, am often tempted by the culture to get all of my
desires fulfilled at the time they pop up.
Yet somehow I am able to control my desires by his grace. No its not easy to be faithful, but those
that wish to follow him, firstly the clergy, are called to take up the cross
and follow him. We forego the things of
the world. We sacrifice and die to self-daily
in our pursuit of his will. And one of
those things that priests are asked to sacrifice is the possibility of marriage
which is primarily for the purpose of children and mutual bonding. It should be no surprise that people in
modernity object to celibacy because as its constantly stated the thing they
most think about is the marital embrace.
Yet God wants more for us. That’s
not to say that the marriage is bad, for it is a great thing but it has a
purpose just as the priesthood has a purpose, and in the west we generally
prefer that distinctions are made and that a priest is not tied to a family
(unless otherwise allowed) for reasons that are I think reasonable. Modern man does not understand this, they
think their life is about pleasure and the more the better, and if you are not
getting any you just aren’t living so it must be changed.
Finally saying that loosening the celibacy requirement will
somehow stop the shortage is a joke.
Just look at the other Christian faiths and they don’t have the
requirement, yet they are in even dire straits then we can imagine. Ask yourself will loosing this requirement
really make Catholics in modernity really think about becoming priests? I mean think about the lifestyle that’s expected
of a priest, always on call, little compensation, treated like dogs by the
media, shamed for teaching what is Catholic, and completely dedicated first and
foremost to God. How many of us can even
begin to accept this as what we are called to.
Paul tells us why being celibate is helpful and quite frankly it makes
sense.
If we are really interested in solving the problems that
face us we need to ask what is at the core of the priest shortage and the call
for priestly celibacy to be removed? It
is fundamentally a crisis of faith, people don’t know the faith and quite
frankly even if they are sacramentalized they don’t care. Catholics contracept and abort their children
out of existence destroying generations of future Catholics including clergy
not only prompting a shortage of prelates but destroying the Catholic family
and even the catholic education system has come under great pressure because
there are so few kids and the modernists have used their positions of influence
to secularize the schools.
So for those of you that think that we must rid the church
of her beautiful traditions and therefore are shouting at Christ on the Cross
telling him to come down from it, to be more in line with what they want I say
to you, You opinion on the matter is foolish and is nothing more than surface
fodder for modern man who lacks the ability to reason to truth in the first
place.
So cheers to you and all my best,
+JMJ+
No comments:
Post a Comment