I remember watching a Simpson’s episode as a child where
Ralph Wiggum receives his report card from the teacher and it reads that he
failed English, and Ralphie says “Me fail English that’s unpossible”. Needless to say after the last couple of days
I have been engaged in different thoughts especially after the terrible and
despicable bombings occurred. I find
myself going back to current as well as old issues in the church. Last night I was reading some different blogs
and I was honestly frustrated with the way some people are running with this
concept of the “New Evangelization”.
Specifically speaking Catholics in the US have different ideas. There are at least 3 groups of Catholics out
there, perhaps 4 but the forth one which I would consider myself part of is
like skateboarding on floss so it seems like madness. So how do these four
groups go about promoting or destroying JPII’s so called new evangelization?
First is the Progressive delegation of the Church. There are many figureheads of this wing, to
name a few
there are the nuns on the bus led by Sr. [?] Campell from the
liberal political lobbying group Network, the LCWR leadership, Fr. James Martin
the progressive Jesuit and thousands of priests near you. Such people will often reference the spirit
of Vatican II when confronted for their dissidency, and do their best to
poo-poo the magisterium when things don’t go their way. I find that their idea of the New
Evangelization consists of tearing down anything traditionally Catholic is
favor of any form of ecumenism. Such
people claim that if the Church is to ever be relevant we must have women
priests, allow the adulterous to receive Holy Communion, give full acceptance
to same sex attracted individuals in all their actions, demand that the
government be our caretakers for life and create a decentralized leadership
more open to apostolic collegiality. If
we do this, they say, people will come to love us and want to be Catholic
because we are thus open to all truly; finally we would be an actual Catholic
Church.
The second group is generally referred to as the
conservative Catholics, some also refer to them as Neo-Cons in the church. You might be familiar with the term RINO
after the last few elections me
aning that they are Republican in name
only. The latter is not a perfect
analogy, but for this I think it serves a purpose. This groups figureheads include the likes of
George Weigle, the late Fr. Richard Nuehouse, many EWTN personalities, many
bishops since the JPII era like Archbishop Dolan, Chaput, Wuerl and so
forth. This group of people is not to be
seen as against the faith like the progressives, but they should concern us
because all too often they don’t actively engage problems with the necessary
zeal. They are also concerning because
they delve into a strict heresy from time to time called Americanism. They will often be on the front lines
defending what they call “Americas First and greatest Freedom”, that is the
freedom of religion. It seems to be that this group sees the new evangelization
as the new spring time for the church were we show love and mercy, only compromising
certain disciplines to create an easier to stomach face of the Church, a
Catholic-protestant wing persay, that many not be specifically heretical but
dance on the edge of indifference and modernism specifically. It is my opinion that this is the most
troubling of the groups because the progressives don’t hide their agenda
anymore because they have become prideful.
These Neo-cons are like Wolves in sheeps clothing, whether knowingly or
not they are a greater danger than the progressives because they keep alive the
Jansinist heresy in different shapes.
The third group is generally referred to as the Tradtionalists
with a capital T. Such people are not
SedeVacantists nor SSPX for both of those groups are either not Catholic or
they are canonically irregular. These
people do find themselves on the edge of this abyss however and include the
likes of Robert Sungenis, Fr. Michael Rodriguez and others. To be sure, and I want to make this clear,
these people are not as bad as either the progessives or the Neo Cons, but they
tend to take things a step too far and try to read all intentions as being
wrong in themselves. It is the
traditionalist view that the New Evangelization is nothing more than a sticker
campaign to distract people from all the problems the church faces.
The last group which I generally find myself in is the traditionally
oriented Catholics. Such other people
would include Fr. Z, Michael Voris, Louie Verrecchio, Patrick Madrid,
Pat Arnold, and so forth. We tend to
love all of the Catholic faith and really wish to promote more traditional practices
within the churches life. We are also
very focused on routing out heresy within the church, but are conscience to the
problems of overt traditionalism like the near denial of VII or overstating the
role of disaplines without the context.
John Zimack who is a fantastic writer for the National Catholic Register
and an author of a number of great books was on churchmilitants Mic’d Up show a
while back and kind of attacked the “New Evangelization” as something without a
a basic underpinning. It does seem like
a bumper sticker campaign as well to us, but we do want to get out and build
the church. Our concern is not the
numbers like the neo-cons and progressives but the quality of the conversion to
Christ. We are focused on teaching the
whole faith, unfiltered truth of the faith and demanding a full commitment to
Holy Mother Church. Perhaps the greatest
way to look at our position is what Fulton Sheen would say, “The Catholic faith
is like a Lion, just uncage it and it will do the rest”.
So what is the New Evangelization, and how should we go
about it? The NE is just the attempt to
rechristianize the West after Protestantism has realized its ultimate end. We should not expect that the new
evangelization will yield grand fruit in terms of the amount of people its
draws in, but we should expect that those drawn in by the no holds barred traditional
approach will be of high quality. IT
reminds me of the early church, there was only 12, but from those zealous 12 Christendom
was born.
+JMJ+
.gif)
